Go to content Go to navigation Go to search

Time on Bush's Missile Defense Push · 6 June 2007, 06:46 CET by Charles Vermeulen

"Critics say the rush to deploy a system before it’s ready and in the face of the opposition of nominal allies is unnecessary, expensive and damaging. (...) [T]hey argue that Bush’s insistence on pursuing deployment agreements now shows that the current push is less about the imminent threat than it is about his legacy."

Why U.S. President Bush is so actively advancing his missile defense agenda according to Time’s Massimo Calabresi.

Technorati , , , ,

home | permalink | comment
Entry Bottom Line

'The Israel Lobby' Subtitled in English · 1 June 2007, 15:34 CET by Charles Vermeulen

YouTube edition of Marije Meerman’s and William de Bruijn’s Tegenlicht / Backlight documentary ‘The Israel Lobby. Portrait of a Great Taboo: the Power of the Israel Lobby in the United States’

Tegenlicht (Backlight) goes international! The makers of ‘The Israel Lobby. Portrait of a Great Taboo: the Power of the Israel Lobby in the United States’ have opened their own channel on YouTube, which contains episodes subtitled in English, that were originally produced for a Dutch speaking audience. ‘The Israel Lobby’ is also available.

Technorati , , , ,

home | permalink | comment
Entry Bottom Line

Documentary on the American Israel Relationship · 3 April 2007, 23:10 CET by Charles Vermeulen

Lawrence Wilkerson in the Tegenlicht documentary 'The Israel Lobby. Portrait of a Great Taboo: the Power of th Israel Lobby in the United States'
Lawrence Wilkerson in the Tegenlicht documentary ‘The Israel Lobby. Portrait of a Great Taboo: the Power of the Israel Lobby in the United States’
"Dick Cheney and his minions have brought – and Richard Perle was one of his minions and Doug Feith is one of his minions – have brought the art of lie to a new scale, a new level. Was oil the number one influence on President Bush and Vice President Cheney? Or was WMD? Or was spreading democracy? I don’t believe it for a moment. They didn’t even think about spreading democracy when they started this war. They transmogrified the mission into [spreading] democracy simply to appease the American people and to give them some reason to support the war. You have to decide were these factors… and inevitably the Jewish lobby in America, AIPAC in particular, the focus lobby, has got to be there. You’re being naive if you don’t put that factor up there as an influence on national security decision-making. Particular with the Bush Administration the AIPAC lobby is very influential through Vice President Cheney. Very Influential! And through people like Elliott Abrams, Paul Wolfowitz and a host of others within the government." (Retired US Army Colonel and former chief of staff to United States Secretary of State Colin Powell Lawrence Wilkerson on the decision making decision-making process that led to the invasion of Iraq in Tegenlicht)

This weeks edition of Tegenlicht, a documentary program by the Dutch public broadcast organization VPRO, allows several interesting opinion makers to speak on the future of the American and Israel relationship and the reception of John Mearsheimer’s and Steve Walt’s controversial articel ‘The Israel Lobby and US foreign policy’. Among others John Mearsheimer, former chief of staff to United States Secretary of State Colin Powell Lawrence Wilkerson, cofounder of the ‘Christians United for Israel’ lobbying group John Hagee, neoconservative Richard Perle and historian Tony Judt express their views in Marije Meerman’s
and William de Bruijn’s documentary. Click here to watch ‘The Israel Lobby. Portrait of a Great Taboo: the Power of the Israel Lobby in the United States’ (‘De Israël Lobby. Portret van een groot taboe: de macht van de Israël lobby in de Verenigde Staten’). No knowledge of Dutch required.

Technorati , , , , , , , , , ,

home | permalink | comment
Entry Bottom Line

The Self-Confidence of John Bolton · 11 March 2007, 08:03 CET by Charles Vermeulen

Yesterday’s edition of Dutch newspaper NRC Handelsblad included an interview with former ‘United States Ambassador to the United Nations’ John Bolton. In the interview Bolton’s self-confidence appears to be still completely intact, despite the neoconservative failures in Iraq, despite the fact that his recess appointment wasn’t prolonged last December. When interviewer Tom-Jan Meeus asked Bolton whether a military solution for Iran’s nuclear ambitions is still a serious option for the US, he answered affirmatively. For he’s ‘convinced that it’s possible to break through the nuclear fuel cycle in Iran, by destroying, for example, their uranium enrichment facility in Natanz. Or the Iranian conversion plant in Isfahan. It’s only necessary to destroy a part of the nuclear fuel cycle to prevent that they will be able to develop nuclear arms.’ Focussing on possible retaliatory actions by Iran Bolton clearly isn’t afraid of the consequences of US military action either: ‘What would Iran do? (...) Do you think that Iran will stop selling oil? They couldn’t. Their whole economy is based on oil selling.’ But what if Iran would increase its military activity in Iraq and kill as many American soldiers as possible? According to Bolton, that wouldn’t be a problem either, because ‘for that reason we’ve just sent extra troops to Iraq’. Nonetheless Bolton adds that he isn’t very fond of a military solution. He would prefer ‘regime change’ in Tehran. Clearly all lessons which could be learned from Iraq are still wasted on Bolton. To Bolton ‘regime change’ still is an almost purely juridical procedure, which ‘only’ requires the defeat of a regular army and in his eyes wars can be completely controlled and aren’t unpredictable at all.

Technorati , , , , , ,

Technorati , , , , , , , , , , ,

home | permalink | comment
Entry Bottom Line

'Rumsfeld Sanctioned Abuse at Abu Ghraib' · 26 November 2006, 01:54 CET by Charles Vermeulen

According to Janis Karpinski, the former U.S. Army Brigadier General who ran the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq until early 2004, Defence Minister Donald Rumsfeld sanctioned the abuse of detainees at the notorious prison. In an interview in today’s edition of Spanish newspaper El Pais Karpinski said she had seen a letter with the Minister’s name printed under it and a written signature above the name, apparently Rumsfeld’s signature, which authorised the use of harsh interrogation methods as sleep deprivation, playing music at maximum volume, making detainees stay for a long time and having them sit in stress positions. In the margin of the letter was written in the same handwriting as the signature’s: ’[m]ake sure this is accomplished’. (Source: Reuters)

Technorati , , , , ,

home | permalink | comment [1]
Entry Bottom Line

Mark Foley and Iraq Carrying Over into Polls · 11 October 2006, 07:48 CET by Charles Vermeulen

"These polls seem to suggest the public has decided to just ‘throw the bums out’" (Public opinion analyst at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, Karlyn Bowman, in ‘War, sex scandal sinking GOP in polls’, a Reuters report published yesterday)

According to a yesterday published Reuters report, based on ‘a flurry of polls’, the failure of Iraq and the Mark Foley scandal have brought the GOP under stress of weather and are ‘endangering [the Republican] control of Congress in the November 7 elections’. Click here to read ‘War, sex scandal sinking GOP in polls’.

Technorati , ,

home | permalink | comment
Entry Bottom Line

'The American Museographic Delirium' · 6 October 2006, 23:10 CET by Charles Vermeulen

"One of the unpleasant surprises during my trip (through the U.S.) was the big number of museums I came upon. Which was ironic, because it’s popular in conservative American circles to put Europe aside as one big museum. The contrary is the case: the city’s of Europe look more dynamic than those of America. The American museographic delirium indicates a collective desire to take on a historical identity, to lay claim on a part of the American past, which in turn indicates a fundamental lack of confidence in the future."

‘Anti-anti-Americanist’ Bernard-Henri Lévi interviewed by Menno de Galan in today’s edition of Dutch newspaper NRC Handelsblad (page 35).

Technorati , ,

home | permalink | comment
Entry Bottom Line

PNAC Closing Down · 30 September 2006, 10:54 CET by Charles Vermeulen

I completely missed it but thanks to Monkeyfister’s posting on Blah3.com, based on a translation into English of an article on Zeit online (Thomas Kleine-Brockhoff, ‘Eine Ideologie packt ein’, 6 September 2006), I learned that William Kristol’s neoconservative bulwark the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) is closing down. ‘Aus Geldmangel, wie es heißt’ and ‘die verbliebenen Mitarbeiter suchen Jobs’, Zeit online reports. For the non-German readers: Monkeyfister’s posting includes a link to the above mentioned translation into English of the Zeit report.

Technorati , ,

home | permalink | comment [1]
Entry Bottom Line

Clinton Did Lose His Temper · 29 September 2006, 23:08 CET by Charles Vermeulen

Unlike William Kristol Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne Jr. saw a genuinely infuriated Bill Clinton on Fox News last Sunday. In his op-ed ‘Why Bill Clinton Pushed Back’ he writes:

"First, he did not go into the studio knowing he would do it. There was, they say, a spontaneity to his anger. But, second, he had thought long and hard about comparisons between his record on terrorism and Bush’s. He had his lines down pat from private musing about how he had been turned into a punching bag by the right. Something like this, one adviser said, was bound to happen eventually."

In Dionne Jr.’s above mentioned article especially radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh is given a sound trashing, by the way. Dionne Jr. reproaches Limbaugh with the fact that the latter, only three weeks after 9/11, attacked Clinton in The Wall Street Journal by holding him ‘culpable for not doing enough when he was commander in chief to combat the terrorists who wound up attacking the World Trade Center and Pentagon’, while his fellow conservatives ‘were arguing simultaneously that it was treasonous finger-pointing to question what Bush did or failed to do to prevent the attacks, but patriotic to go after Clinton.’

Rush Limbaugh pouring oil on the flames
Rush Limbaugh pouring oil on the flames – Link on the frontpage of RushLimbaugh.com to Limbaugh’s op-ed ‘Clinton’s Legacy. He didn’t do enough to stop terrorists’

Limbaugh, apparently being very elated about the attention he’s getting from Dionne Jr., enthusiastically throws some extra oil on the flames by offering a link on the frontpage of RushLimbaugh.com to the Wall Street Journal ‘column that E.J. Dionne Jr. is still angry about’, ‘Clinton’s Legacy. He didn’t do enough to stop terrorists’.

Technorati , , ,

home | permalink | comment
Entry Bottom Line

Clinton Didn't Really Lose His Temper · 26 September 2006, 21:58 CET by Charles Vermeulen

According editor of The Weekly Standard and supreme neoconservative William Kristol Bill Clinton didn’t really lost his temper during the Fox News interview broadcasted last Sunday. On the contrary, ‘the former president knew what he was doing’. Even the early availability of a transcript of the interview, which I referred to in the previous posting, was probably part of preconceived strategy of "Clinton’s aides", Kristol suspects. But if so, ‘what could Clinton have been seeking to accomplish?’ In an editorial on The Daily Standard Kristol comes up with three possible motives.

Technorati ,

home | permalink | comment
Entry Bottom Line

Previous